This is the mail archive of the
docbook@lists.oasis-open.org
mailing list for the DocBook project.
Re: strange definition of & and < in iso-num.ent
- From: Norman Walsh <ndw at nwalsh dot com>
- To: Alexander Dupuy <dupuy at sysd dot com>
- Cc: docbook at lists dot oasis-open dot org
- Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 09:59:29 -0500
- Subject: DOCBOOK: Re: strange definition of & and < in iso-num.ent
- References: <3E543239.6030506@sysd.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
/ Alexander Dupuy <dupuy at sysd dot com> was heard to say:
| In the XML entities file iso-num.ent (ISO Numeric and Special Graphic
| Entities V0.3 $Id: iso-num.ent,v 1.3 2002/06/13 17:39:20 nwalsh Exp $)
| there are the following two rather odd definitions of & and <:
|
| <!ENTITY lt "&#60;"> <!-- LESS-THAN SIGN -->
| <!ENTITY amp "&#38;"> <!-- AMPERSAND -->
|
| which effectively define the < entity as "<" and & as "&".
|
| In practice, this has little effect, since the XML spec predefines
| & and < as "&" and "<", and most tools won't modify those
| definitions, but it can cause some confusion. You can see somebody
| relying on these definitions in
| http://www.mulberrytech.com/quickref/XMLquickref.pdf (where, on the
| second page, the list of Predefined General Entities gives these
| strange definitions of & and <).
|
| Unless there is some subtle reason beyond my understanding why these
| definitions should be given as such, they should probably be corrected
| in the next release.
They are correct as defined. See the XML Recommendation[1] for an
explanation.
Be seeing you,
norm
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml#sec-predefined-ent
- --
Norman Walsh <ndw at nwalsh dot com> | Fast. Cheap. Well. Pick two.
http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ |
Chair, DocBook Technical Committee |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.7 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
iD8DBQE+VO1ROyltUcwYWjsRAkn0AJ9W8oT/4r4CuohRDYqR/bL6fpcjaACggMih
cWG2iHwqIcrFjFkb63MPm9U=
=rPk/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----