This is the mail archive of the
docbook@lists.oasis-open.org
mailing list for the DocBook project.
Re: any reason why a "procedure" is not a child of "para"?
- From: Norman Walsh <ndw at nwalsh dot com>
- To: docbook mailing list <docbook at lists dot oasis-open dot org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 07:42:35 -0500
- Subject: DOCBOOK: Re: any reason why a "procedure" is not a child of "para"?
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0303070753260.14562-100000@dell>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
/ "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday at mindspring dot com> was heard to say:
| i just noticed that the procedure element cannot be a child
| of a para, as can other lists. any reason for this? it seems
| like this would be useful if a procedure should be considered
| part of its enclosing paragraph. just curious.
I don't recall consciously deciding to exclude it. File an RFE, I guess.
Be seeing you,
norm
- --
Norman Walsh <ndw at nwalsh dot com> | Debugging is 99% complete most of
http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | the time--Fred Brooks, jr.
Chair, DocBook Technical Committee |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.7 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
iD8DBQE+bys6OyltUcwYWjsRArr6AJ46PHhkOEOfsuL8tS0wEO9OMYHZywCcDMLR
QZcdkORZp+SiGscvqf4mLKQ=
=0jL+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----