This is the mail archive of the
docbook@lists.oasis-open.org
mailing list for the DocBook project.
RE: Re: any reason why a "procedure" is not a child of "para"?
- From: David Cramer <dcramer at motive dot com>
- To: docbook mailing list <docbook at lists dot oasis-open dot org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 11:13:33 -0600
- Subject: RE: DOCBOOK: Re: any reason why a "procedure" is not a child of "para"?
Ah, I see that procedures can be inside things that can be in procedures
etc (listitem, admons). It never occurred to me to try that. Never mind.
David
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Biss [mailto:jeff at marco-inc dot com]
Placing a procedure within a table doesn't add much but could provide a
better indication of where the procedure starts and stops because of the
table's lines. I was forced to do this when working for a customer to
David Cramer wrote:
>Nested procedures, procedures inside of tables, etc. would be
messy--not
>sure how you'd number them. <substeps> allows you to nest procedures
>without that problem. I think no procedures in paras is a good thing.
>
>David