This is the mail archive of the
docbook@lists.oasis-open.org
mailing list for the DocBook project.
Re: Re: any reason why a "procedure" is not a child of "para"?
- From: "John R. Daily" <john at geekhavoc dot com>
- To: docbook mailing list <docbook at lists dot oasis-open dot org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 15:44:47 -0500
- Subject: Re: DOCBOOK: Re: any reason why a "procedure" is not a child of "para"?
- References: <200303121751.h2CHpFbI013294@village.eng.sun.com>
At (time_t)1047491475 Steve Cogorno wrote:
> Procedure's aren't simply a list of steps - steps can have alternatives,
> substeps and content that introduces the steps. If procedures were permitted
> in para, then procdures could nest within themselves.
They already can, as direct children of other procedures or as
the contents of a step.
--
John R. Daily
<email><mailbox>john</mailbox><domain>geekhavoc.com</domain></email>