This is the mail archive of the docbook@lists.oasis-open.org mailing list for the DocBook project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
But suppose I could, how would you propose to formally describe the structures that are valid. What constitutes valid is not an academic question, it has direct bearing on how tools work.
I'm not sure what I meant back then, but I do think that there should be one normative schema included in the spec (eg a normative/official RNG).
I guess what I meant was that tools processing DocBook documents should not be required to support any specific schema language (eg requiring WXS+PSVI support for conformance). DTD support is required through the XML spec, but ideally the DBX spec should avoid building on this type of dependency.
-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Jirka Kosek e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz http://www.kosek.cz
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |