This is the mail archive of the
ecos-devel@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: eCos efficiency
- From: PRINCE ARORA <prince at cdotd dot ernet dot in>
- To: Jonathan Larmour <jifl at eCosCentric dot com>
- Cc: ecos-devel at sources dot redhat dot com, Prince Arora <libra!prince>
- Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2003 10:13:43 +0500 (GMT+0500)
- Subject: Re: eCos efficiency
- >received: from libra.cdotd.ernet.in by cdotd.cdotd.ernet.in (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)id KAA08289; Sat, 12 Apr 2003 10:16:56 -0500
Hi,
I explain my project model. I have 4 or 5 nodes connected via bus. On all
nodes i want real time operating system. Through one node my LAN is
connected to outside world from which many messages are pumping into my
gateway node. There are also internal messages between the LAN. Suppose i
want my project to handle 2 lac messages(internal +external) per hr. The
processing of messages including processing, computing, writing on
secondary storage, and passing messgaes to other nodes.
In that scenario, eCos is efficient.? What i hv gone thru net, i found
eCos is mainly for embedded devices.
Thanks and Regards
Prince Arora
On Fri, 11 Apr 2003, Jonathan Larmour wrote:
> PRINCE ARORA wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I heard that eCos is very efficient RTOS for embedded devices. Since in
> > case of embedded devices main work of OS comes into picture when embedded
> > device gets active.
> >
> > For a project, in which many eternal processes are
> > running 24hrs and 365 days in a year and lots of process
> > scheduling/de-scheduling takes place, is the eCos is efficient for that
> > type of system ?
>
> I'm not sure what you mean by "efficient", but eCos is low footprint and
> doesn't use many resources, and that's true after it's been running 1 day
> or 1 year.
>
> Jifl
> --
> eCosCentric http://www.eCosCentric.com/ The eCos and RedBoot experts
> --[ "You can complain because roses have thorns, or you ]--
> --[ can rejoice because thorns have roses." -Lincoln ]-- Opinions==mine
>
>
>