This is the mail archive of the ecos-devel@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the eCos project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: at91eb40a with memory extension card at91mec01

From: "Slawek" <sgp at telsatgp dot com dot pl>
To: "Jonathan Larmour" <jifl at eCosCentric dot com>
Cc: <ecos-devel at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2003 20:20:34 +0200
Subject: Re: at91eb40a with memory extension card at91mec01
References: <004f01c34208$c85e7130$0205a8c0@slawek> <3F059D3D.8080809@eCosCentric.com>

Jonathan Larmour wrote:

>> I needed support for additional RAM available on at91mec01 card so I
>> have forked at91eb40a target. I called my new target eb40a_mec01.
> Actually if the RAM is the *only* difference, that could be made an option 
> within the EB40a HAL.

Ok, I'll try to understand those cdl's.

btw Using FLASH is not trivial.
In fact I can see no method to map two blocks of 2 MB and one of 1 MB in continous area on that processor.

So I am mapping it non-continous and I'm not using it. Eventually somebody may want to move some code and or data to the other FLASH block.

-- 
Slawek Piotrowski

Follow-Ups:
- Re: at91eb40a with memory extension card at91mec01
  - From: Jonathan Larmour

References:
- at91eb40a with memory extension card at91mec01
  - From: Slawek
- Re: at91eb40a with memory extension card at91mec01
  - From: Jonathan Larmour

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]