This is the mail archive of the
ecos-devel@sourceware.org
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: Adding Kinetis boards
Hi Ilija,
On 15/12/11 18:04, Ilija Kocho wrote:
> It may be just enough to add a new target entry in ecos.db.
> I am not familiar with Kwikstik I only know that it is based on same
> chip as TWR-K40. Can you please point the differences between boards
> with respect to: HAL, devices, etc.
I think HAL-wise the Kwikstik board is the same as the twr-40x256, it
just exposes different features of the MCU through the attached devices,
which include a microphone, a buzzer, an audio output, rechargeable
battery (with usb charging), a dot-matrix LCD.
The Kwistik is attractive because of its low cost (~$30), and even comes
with an on board Segger J-Link chip! Seems like an affordable base for
all kinds of hobby projects.
I think just having an additional target might work with all the
differences handled in device implementation, and all the HAL
functionality subsumed under the twr-k40x256, e.g., in the case of the LCD.
Tomas
>
> Ilija
>
> On 15.12.2011 17:57, Tomas Frydrych wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am looking at adding the Kwikstik to the current Kinetis boards, and I
>> am wondering what would be the best way to approach this.
>>
>> Currently there are two Kinetis boards, the TWR-K40X256 and TWR-K60N512,
>> with the directory structure something like this:
>>
>> kinetis/var/... - Generic Kinetis code
>> kinetis/twr_k40x256 - K40 and twr-k40 code
>> kinetis/twr_k60x256 - K60 and twr-k60 code
>>
>> Kwikstik is based on the same MCU as the twr-k40x256, so it needs the
>> same MCU-specific code as the twr-k40x256 board, which I think is all,
>> or nearly all of the code currently under the twr_k40x256 directory.
>>
>> I initially thought I'd just clone twr_k40x256 into a new kwikstik
>> directory, but that's probably not the best approach for
>> maintainability. I am thinking it might be better to split out the
>> generic K40 code so it can be shared between distinct boards, but I am
>> not sure where to split this to: should there be a separate k40x256
>> subdirectory and a corresponding package that the twr_k40x256 requires?
>> Or is there a better way of approaching this altogether?
>>
>> Many thanks in advance,
>>
>> Tomas
>>
>>