This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: probably a FAQ, but: how many x86 ports are in motion out there?
- To: <ecos-discuss at sourceware dot cygnus dot com>
- Subject: Re: [ECOS] probably a FAQ, but: how many x86 ports are in motion out there?
- From: "Roland Schwarz" <roland dot schwarz at telecom dot at>
- Date: Thu, 7 Oct 1999 18:30:17 +0200
Hi,
the x86, pc104 platform still is not on the list of supported
targets. As the toolchain is hosted on x86 I suppose it will be
straightforward to target to this platform.
Is this true?
Thank you,
Roland
-----Original Message-----
From: Bart Veer <bartv@cygnus.co.uk>
To: utz@serv.net <utz@serv.net>
Cc: ecos-discuss@cygnus.com <ecos-discuss@cygnus.com>
Date: Dienstag, 02. März 1999 23:32
Subject: Re: [ECOS] probably a FAQ, but: how many x86 ports are in motion
out there?
>>>>>> "John" == The Utz Family <utz@serv.net> writes:
>
> John> whats the status on x86? x86/pc103/4? amd-sc400?
>
>Currently there is no port of eCos to embedded x86 platforms, but such
>a port by Cygnus is now under consideration. This would target
>processors from the 386 upwards - support for earlier processors would
>be difficult because of compiler issues.
>
>Please see the section on porting in the sourceware FAQ for more
>details, http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ecos/faq.html
>
>Bart Veer // eCos net maintainer
>