This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
hal_vsr_table for i386.
- To: "Ecos-List (E-mail)" <ecos-discuss at sourceware dot cygnus dot com>
- Subject: [ECOS] hal_vsr_table for i386.
- From: Fabrice Gautier <Fabrice_Gautier at sdesigns dot com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 18:14:00 -0700
Hi,
Currently, in the i386 hal (and in all the other archs) hal_vsr_table is
defined as a:
CYG_ADDRESS hal_vsr_table[CYGNUM_HAL_VSR_COUNT]
But this doesn't match the reality of the VSR table which for the i386 has
64bit entries.
Does it matter a lot if hal_vsr_table has another type than the current one?
Or Is it better if this structure is kept as is, and maintened up to date
with the table really used by the CPU?
Thanks
--
Fabrice Gautier
fabrice_gautier@sdesigns.com