This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: Really dumb newbie question
- To: ecos-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com
- Subject: Re: [ECOS] Really dumb newbie question
- From: "Lewin A.R.W. Edwards" <larwe at larwe dot com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 09:05:07 -0500
- References: <"Lewin A.R.W. Edwards"'s message of "Wed, 10 Jan 2001 20:48:34 -0500"><4.3.2.7.2.20010110203811.00ae6860@larwe.com>
>Lewin> OrCAD - 940,304 bytes, 06/30/98 07:33a WINDOWS\SYSTEM - 995,383
>
>Lewin> I can email you the WINDOWS\SYSTEM copy if you want.
>
>Probably wouldn't work as Tim's using NT4.
Well, a colleague has eCos's Windows host-end installed on an NT4 machine
also, so I could give him the MFC42 from there. However I assumed that this
file, or at least recent versions of it, cover both platforms, because I
have programs that claim compatibility with both, and their install media
have only one version of the file.
>Lewin> before attempting any editing, since the config tool crashes
>Lewin> very often (for me at least) when saving edits to an existing
>
>The config tool is more stable on NT than on
>Windows9x/ME/suffix-of-the-day but even on NT it tends to bomb (for me
>anyway) after saving the same config 5-10 times.
I haven't noticed a great deal of difference between NT4, 98SE and Win2k.
If I had time (how many times do I say that every day) I would investigate
further. I have a gut feeling that the problem is related to the way the
tree control is coded.
How about recoding the config tool in Java? :)
=== Lewin A.R.W. Edwards (Embedded Engineer)
Work: http://www.digi-frame.com/
Personal: http://www.zws.com/ and http://www.larwe.com/
"Und setzet ihr nicht das Leben ein,
Nie wird euch das Leben gewonnen sein."