This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: NASTY bug in eCos ConfigTool 1.3.1.2 Win32
- To: Gary Thomas <gthomas at cambridge dot redhat dot com>
- Subject: Re: [ECOS] NASTY bug in eCos ConfigTool 1.3.1.2 Win32
- From: Jonathan Larmour <jlarmour at redhat dot com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 19:04:51 +0100
- Cc: "Trenton D. Adams" <tadams at extremeeng dot com>,eCos <ecos-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd.
- References: <XFMail.20010613061340.gthomas@cambridge.redhat.com>
Gary Thomas wrote:
>
> On 12-Jun-2001 Trenton D. Adams wrote:
> > I have two separate configs. The are identical except one is RAM, and
> > the other is ROM support for the kernel. If I change from ROM to RAM
> > support, it doesn't allow me to save the new configuration under the
> > current project. I have to select File|Exit in order for it to ask me
> > to save and then it will finally acutally save it. This caused me to
> > compile a program thinking it would run in RAM when it was actually
> > meant to be run in ROM.
>
> Does this problem exist with the latest (Config Tool 2.0 alpha)?
>
> The old tool is no longer maintained, so the most we can do is make
> sure that the problem is fixed in the new one.
This is a bit of an exaggeration. The old tool is no longer being improved
and developed. Instead development effort is concentrated on the Config
tools v2. It is still being maintained however.
Jifl
--
Red Hat, Rustat House, Clifton Road, Cambridge, UK. Tel: +44 (1223) 271062
Maybe this world is another planet's Hell -Aldous Huxley || Opinions==mine
Come to the Red Hat TechWorld open source conference in Brussels!
Keynotes, techie talks and exhibitions http://www.redhat-techworld.com/