This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
RE: new edb7xxx_misc.c for PCMCIA support
- To: "'Jonathan Larmour'" <jlarmour at redhat dot com>
- Subject: RE: [ECOS] new edb7xxx_misc.c for PCMCIA support
- From: "Trenton D. Adams" <trent dot nospam at telusplanet dot net>
- Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 14:44:11 -0600
- Cc: "'eCos discussion'" <ecos-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jlarmour@garibaldi.jifvik.org
> [mailto:jlarmour@garibaldi.jifvik.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Larmour
> Sent: June 23, 2001 1:29 PM
> To: trenton.adams@telusplanet.net
> Cc: 'eCos discussion'
> Subject: Re: [ECOS] new edb7xxx_misc.c for PCMCIA support
>
>
> "Trenton D. Adams" wrote:
> >
> > > But why not just install interrupt handlers in your PCMCIA device
> > > driver for both these interrupts? Or are there other
> things on those
> > > IRQ lines?
> >
> > Actually, that's a good point. I suppose I could do that
> if I'm not
> > using them for anything else. But, it would probably be better to
> > make new ones in case someone else decides they want to use those
> > later though right?
>
> If the board simply doesn't have anything else connected to
> those IRQ lines, then you may as well just take the easy
> route and use the existing decoded interrupts.
Was I taking the correct approach though if I had something else
connected to those lines? I'm new with eCos so I'd like to know! :)