This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: Porting ecos on at91 eb01 board
- To: Jonathan Larmour <jlarmour at redhat dot com>, harri dot siirtola at vtt dot fi
- Subject: Re: [ECOS] Porting ecos on at91 eb01 board
- From: harri dot siirtola at vtt dot fi
- Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2001 09:21:07 +0300
- Cc: ecos-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com, carl at openfuel dot com
At 16:57 5.7.2001 +0100, Jonathan Larmour wrote:
>If you are stating that you're putting the files into the public domain,
>that would avoid the assignment itself. But when I talked about the
>assignment, I was also including the "disclaimer" part which has to be
>signed by your employer. This is needed because most people's contracts in
>the software industry say that all intellectual property belongs to the
>employer. This is even true of universities. So we'd really need that at
>least from both of you.
If I understand this correctly, public domain is the easiest way, isn't it?
I'll check if my company requires the assignment way.
>
>We can still put together a tarball that is distributed separately, but it
>wouldn't be able to go in the eCos sources properly meaning it may be
>subject to bitrot.
True, let's try to do this so that it helps people next year, too...
>
>Jifl
Harri