This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
RE: RTC format
- To: "'Trenton D. Adams'" <tadams at extremeeng dot com>,"'eCos Discussion'" <ecos-discuss at sourceware dot cygnus dot com>
- Subject: RE: [ECOS] RTC format
- From: "Trenton D. Adams" <tadams at extremeeng dot com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 15:55:38 -0600
- Organization: Extreme Engineering
I forgot to divide by 365! :) So, it's actually 136 years if anyone
cares. I doubt they do.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Trenton D. Adams [mailto:tadams@extremeeng.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 3:15 PM
> To: 'Trenton D. Adams'; 'eCos Discussion'
> Subject: RE: [ECOS] RTC format
>
>
> I just noticed it's a 1Hz clock so I assume it's stored in
> seconds from 1980? I don't think 49,710 years will be a problem! :)
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ecos-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com
> > [mailto:ecos-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com] On Behalf Of
> > Trenton D. Adams
> > Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 3:10 PM
> > To: 'eCos Discussion'
> > Subject: [ECOS] RTC format
> >
> >
> > Is there a standard format for RTCs? I don't know what to
> > write to the RTC 32-bit register to set it. I came up with
> > my own hh:mm:ss.xxx format for storage in a 32 bit
> > register, but I wonder if it's compatible? After all, I
> > certainly hope it's not based on ms from some date because
> > it would only store 49.xxx days then.
> >
> > bit | measurement
> > _________________
> > 27-23 | hours
> > 22-17 | minutes
> > 16-10 | seconds
> > 9-0 | milliseconds
> >
> >
>