This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: romfs base address
- To: wjasper at tx dot ncsu dot edu
- Subject: Re: [ECOS] romfs base address
- From: Jonathan Larmour <jlarmour at redhat dot com>
- Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2001 14:41:41 +0100
- Cc: ecos-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com
- Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd.
- References: <200108071324.JAA02368@lx10.tx.ncsu.edu>
Warren Jasper wrote:
>
> I see that
>
> cdl_option CYGNUM_FS_ROM_BASE_ADDRESS {
> # Flavor: data
> user_value 0x8200000
> # value_source user
> # Default value: 0x50040000
> };
>
> Is no longer defined in the ecos.ecc cdl file.
It was only ever used by the test.
> Could someone please tell
> me EXACTLY how to speify the base adress for the rom fs. Is this
> done only in the MTAB entry in the application code? For example is
> this correct?
>
> //==========================================================================
>
> #define CYGNUM_FS_ROM_BASE_ADDRESS 0x8200000
> MTAB_ENTRY( romfs_mte1,
> "/",
> "romfs",
> "",
> (CYG_ADDRWORD) CYGNUM_FS_ROM_BASE_ADDRESS );
Yes, assuming you've actually _put_ a ROMFS at that address :-).
Jifl
--
Red Hat, Rustat House, Clifton Road, Cambridge, UK. Tel: +44 (1223) 271062
Maybe this world is another planet's Hell -Aldous Huxley || Opinions==mine