This is the mail archive of the ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the eCos project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

RE: WaveLAN PCMCIA network driver


Actually, so do I! :)  I was looking at two different source code files.
My old one was MANFID and the new one was using VERS_1 so I was getting
the version information not Manufacturer information.  So, mine is as
you said 0x0156!

Do you have a working eCos driver for your WaveLAN cards?  If so, would
you be interested in sending it over?  The one I got from Andrea didn't
have the headers to go with it.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Todd Malsbary [mailto:toddm@iobjects.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 10:53 AM
> To: Trenton D. Adams; eCos Discussion
> Subject: RE: [ECOS] WaveLAN PCMCIA network driver
> 
> 
> I've got an Orinoco WaveLAN card that reports 0x0156 as the 
> manufacturer
> ID at offset 2 after cf_get_CIS().  That's worked for me on all the
> Orinoco cards that we have here.
> 
> Todd
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Trenton D. Adams [mailto:tadams@extremeeng.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 8:25 AM
> > To: eCos Discussion
> > Subject: [ECOS] WaveLAN PCMCIA network driver
> > 
> > 
> > I finally got the CL-PS6700 going.  The documentation failed 
> > to mention
> > one small thing that caused it not to work.
> > 
> > Anyhow...
> > 
> > 
> > I'm looking at "dev/if_sc_lpe.c".  I noticed that it checks for the
> > manufacturer ID of 0x0104 at offset 2 of the buffer after calling
> > cf_get_CIS ().  Is this likely going to be at a different 
> offset into
> > the MANFID for every single card?  My wavelan card goes 
> 0x15 0x50 0x05
> > starting at offset 0 into the MANFID.  It then goes "Lucent
> > Technologies", "WaveLAN/IEEE" and finally "Version 01.01".
> > 
> > I'm not sure what the 0x15 0x50 and 0x05 represent, but I haven't
> > received the documentation that Orinoco promised me yet.  
> > Maybe I should
> > just check for the first two strings when writing my driver?  That's
> > assuming of course all future WaveLAN cards will work in the 
> > same way as
> > my version 1.1 card.  Of course anyone that finds any different can
> > modify the driver to check for those cases.  Right?
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Trenton D. Adams
> > Extreme Engineering
> > #17, 6025 - 12 St. SE
> > Calgary, Alberta, Canada
> > T2H 2K1
> > 
> > Phone: 403 640 9494 ext-208
> > Fax: 403 640 9599
> > 
> > http://www.extremeeng.com
> > 
> > 
> 


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]