This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: c++ ecos performance
On Mon, 2002-03-11 at 05:33, Mike Moran wrote:
> Grant Edwards wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 09:29:01AM -0600, Rosimildo da Silva wrote:
> > > I dare to ask: what is "unsafe" in C++ that is not in C ?
> >
> > Nothing. C is also unsafe. But, C is far simpler, so it's
> > easier to avoid the pitfalls.
>
> Using this line of reasoning, it would be far safer to have
> only a hammer in ones toolbox (perhaps only a rubber hammer).
>
> Perhaps we could even get some government regulations to
> protect us from our selves.
>
> Oops ... I did it again,
> mike
Perhaps you folks could take this [religious] discussion offline?
Thanks.
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss