Re: [ECOS] patches reviewed?

[Jonathan Larmour <jifl at jifvik dot org>]

"David N. Welton" wrote:
> 
> Gary Thomas <gary@chez-thomas.org> writes:
> 
> > Sorry for the problems (those lists are out of our hands)
> 
> Is it time for an infrastructure change, at this point?

It could be argued. However there's a lot of history with the current
setup. And of course sources.redhat.com provides a lot of infrastructure
and resources that we'd need to duplicate and pay for.... and without a
company behind it it's more difficult. Unless we moved to SourceForge or
similar.

> I would suggest, for one thing, grabbing a good hostname that can be
> used to host a web page, even if the provider/hosting service switches
> around.

All the good domains are taken of course :-). Although we have a few ideas
which we could use if we did decide to move after all. I won't mention them
to prevent domain squatting.

Jifl
-- 
--[ "You can complain because roses have thorns, or you ]--
--[  can rejoice because thorns have roses." -Lincoln   ]-- Opinions==mine

-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss