This is the mail archive of the ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the eCos project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

RE: ping is resulting in 50% packet loss.


I had a similar problem when using the 860T fec driver initially.
What it turned out to be was the IP stack or upper level networking code
was calling fec_eth_start and fec_eth_init and both functions were
setting the eConrtol_EN bit in the eControl byte. This was screwing up
the state machine of the fec and causing it to act goofy. My work around
for this was in fec_eth_start to check if eControl_EN was not enabled in
the eControl byte before enabling it there.

if(!(qi->fec->eControl & eControl_EN))
{
  qi->fec->eControl |= eControl_EN;
  qi->fec->RxUpdate = 0x0f0f0f0f;
}

-----Original Message-----
From: Khasim [mailto:khasim@iwavesystems.com] 
Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2002 9:19 PM
To: ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
Subject: [ECOS] ping is resulting in 50% packet loss.

Greetings

I saw same sort of question in the Discussion list but I didnt get the
answer properly.

I have ported the TCP/IP stack it is running from FLASH no redboot. When
I
ping from other windows machine to my boards ip address the ping is
resulting in 60 or some times 50% packet loss.

* I have not enabled any prints or debug messages.
* But when I see in ethreal each packet is replied.
* I dont know which TCP/IP stack I am using old or new.How to know
this???

Suggesstions please....

With regards
Khasim..

Here is the output on cmd prompt

C:\>ping -n 100 192.168.1.21

Pinging 192.168.1.21 with 32 bytes of data:

Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Reply from 192.168.1.21: bytes=32 time=501ms TTL=255
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Reply from 192.168.1.21: bytes=32 time=250ms TTL=255
Reply from 192.168.1.21: bytes=32 time=250ms TTL=255
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Reply from 192.168.1.21: bytes=32 time=661ms TTL=255
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Reply from 192.168.1.21: bytes=32 time=821ms TTL=255
Reply from 192.168.1.21: bytes=32 time=250ms TTL=255
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Reply from 192.168.1.21: bytes=32 time=251ms TTL=255
Reply from 192.168.1.21: bytes=32 time=250ms TTL=255
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Reply from 192.168.1.21: bytes=32 time=251ms TTL=255
Reply from 192.168.1.21: bytes=32 time=250ms TTL=255
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Reply from 192.168.1.21: bytes=32 time=250ms TTL=255
Reply from 192.168.1.21: bytes=32 time=251ms TTL=255
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Reply from 192.168.1.21: bytes=32 time=250ms TTL=255
Reply from 192.168.1.21: bytes=32 time=250ms TTL=255
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Reply from 192.168.1.21: bytes=32 time=251ms TTL=255
Reply from 192.168.1.21: bytes=32 time=250ms TTL=255
Request timed out.
Request timed out.

Ping statistics for 192.168.1.21:
    Packets: Sent = 40, Received = 16, Lost = 24 (60% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 250ms, Maximum =  821ms, Average =  130ms
Control-C


-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss


--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]