This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
RE: New ARM core port
- From: Gary Thomas <gary at mlbassoc dot com>
- To: Patrick Doyle <wpd at delcomsys dot com>
- Cc: eCos Discussion <ecos-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: 18 Dec 2002 13:36:20 -0700
- Subject: RE: [ECOS] New ARM core port
- References: <NFBBJAJICAKJPMMKDAGBMELCDHAA.wpd@delcomsys.com>
On Wed, 2002-12-18 at 13:30, Patrick Doyle wrote:
> > I don't see any good reason to break how the ARM platforms are
> > already being handled (yes, I know they don't match how PowerPC
> > and MIPS are done), so I think just putting it under hal/arm/arm9
> > would be best.
> >
> Actually, I was planning on creating hal/arm/omap, hal/arm/omap/var, and
> hal/arm/omap/platform1, hal/arm/omap/platform2, etc...
>
> Would you prefer that I put the new platform(s) under hal/arm/arm9?
I would think so - aren't they ARM9 variants? Whatever that is
special about being "omap" could be separated out if there is
much to it (as opposed to what is special about being "arm9")
You might end up with something like this:
hal/
arm/
arch
arm9/
var
omap_platform1
omap_platform2
...
If there is sufficient overlap, then you might add
omap
to handle the common parts.
--
------------------------------------------------------------
Gary Thomas |
MLB Associates | Consulting for the
+1 (970) 229-1963 | Embedded world
http://www.mlbassoc.com/ |
email: <gary@mlbassoc.com> |
gpg: http://www.chez-thomas.org/gary/gpg_key.asc
------------------------------------------------------------
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss