This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
RE: Can anybody compare the ARM tools (compiler, assembler,linker etc) to the GNUPro Tools ?
- From: "Qiang Huang" <jameshq at liverpool dot ac dot uk>
- To: "Jonathan Larmour" <jifl at eCosCentric dot com>
- Cc: "Ecos-Discuss" <ecos-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 10:46:40 -0000
- Subject: RE: [ECOS] Can anybody compare the ARM tools (compiler, assembler,linker etc) to the GNUPro Tools ?
the one for altera excalibur. thanks.
(If I want to use the ecos, must I always use the GNUPro tools set? if so
the ecos is always compiler dependent. not like the RTOS: uCOS? so what's
the advantage of using ecos as a compiler dependent RTOS? Thanks a lot.)
-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Larmour [mailto:jifl@eCosCentric.com]
Sent: 13 January 2003 03:55
To: Qiang Huang
Cc: Ecos-Discuss
Subject: Re: [ECOS] Can anybody compare the ARM tools (compiler,
assembler,linker etc) to the GNUPro Tools ?
Qiang Huang wrote:
> which will be the best choice? thanks
Which versions, and from where?
Jifl
--
eCosCentric http://www.eCosCentric.com/ <info@eCosCentric.com>
--[ "You can complain because roses have thorns, or you ]--
--[ can rejoice because thorns have roses." -Lincoln ]-- Opinions==mine
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss