This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: need cdl help
> Actually it is a bit of a mistake. When the interface has no
> implementations, the requires will have no effect because the interface
> will then be inactive (in the CDL sense). So in practice this would permit
> no watchdog implementations.
What is the logic behind this? To me, 0 is just as valid as any other
number for an interface ? Can you still access an interfaces value
when its disabled? I guess so, other wise
requires 1==CYGINT_WATCHDOG_IMPLEMENTATION
in the package would not correctly evaluate when it was zero.
Andrew
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss