This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: Re: OpenRISC eCos package
- From: Jonathan Larmour <jifl at eCosCentric dot com>
- To: Robert Cragie <rcc at jennic dot com>
- Cc: Scott Furman <sfurman at rosum dot com>, bartv at eCosCentric dot com,ECOS <ecos-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 17:21:34 +0100
- Subject: Re: [ECOS] Re: OpenRISC eCos package
- References: <NMEDLDELHPEFHOMFIJBHCEIPCLAA.rcc@jennic.com>
[ OpenRISC list de-CC'd ]
Robert Cragie wrote:
What I have noticed is that the HALs do seem to be succinctly different for
the different processors therefore I was wondering if any in particular is
considered to be a 'model' template from which to work.
Difficult to say as generally the best advice is to choose something
similar in design.
Personally, I would recommend the MIPS HAL, but obviously others will
differ ;).
Jifl
--
eCosCentric http://www.eCosCentric.com/ The eCos and RedBoot experts
--[ "You can complain because roses have thorns, or you ]--
--[ can rejoice because thorns have roses." -Lincoln ]-- Opinions==mine
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss