This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: vfnprintf and negative integers
- From: Andrew Lunn <andrew dot lunn at ascom dot ch>
- To: Ian Gilmour <ian dot gilmour at ffei dot co dot uk>
- Cc: "Ecos-Discuss (E-mail)" <ecos-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 11:00:29 +0200
- Subject: Re: [ECOS] vfnprintf and negative integers
- References: <334D05460466D311A5E8009027AC788603880A6D@hhmail1.hh.ffei.co.uk>
> So does anyone know of a gcc/binutils combination that actually work?
I don't think anybody has look any further at trying to identify the
compiler bug. I suggest you take this up on the gcc mailing lists.
> Or are people just applying the suggested frig to the SARG macro indicated
> in the email archive.
I applied the patch to CVS, so i guess people are using that. I've had
one report that the frig works and no reports it does not work....
Andrew
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss