This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
processes vs threads (MMU protection)
- From: Armando Visconti <armando dot visconti at st dot com>
- To: ecos-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 12:03:54 +0200
- Subject: [ECOS] processes vs threads (MMU protection)
- Organization: ST Microelectronics
I would like to ask to the mantainers why the work
done by 3G lab on 'memory protection' has not
been included in eCos v2.0.
Is not stable enough?
Don't you think it would be great for a MMU
based system to get benefit from a memory
protected OS ?
Any plan in this direction?
Thanks for any comment,
Armando.
--
+--------------------------------------------------+
Armando Visconti Cellular: +39 340 9239426
SW Engineer Fax: +39 02 93519702
Printer Division Work: +39 02 93519683
ST Microelectronics <armando.visconti@st.com>
via Tolomeo, 1
Cornaredo (MI) - 20010
ITALY
+--------------------------------------------------+
begin:vcard
n:Visconti;Armando
tel;cell:+39 340 9239426
tel;fax:+39 02 93519702
tel;work:+39 02 93519683
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
org:ST Microelectronics;Printer Division
adr:;;via Tolomeo, 1;Cornaredo (MI);;20010;ITALY
version:2.1
email;internet:armando.visconti@st.com
title:SW Engineer
fn:Armando Visconti
end:vcard
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss