Re: [ECOS] Re: remove NOT_IN_RAM handling

[Gary Thomas <gary at mlbassoc dot com>]

On Thu, 2003-11-20 at 06:51, Jani Monoses wrote:
> > You might leave the interface in the CDL and make it an error if it
> > is ever "implemented".  That way we'd catch the problem as soon as 
> > possible.
> 
> I thought the config system would detect that an unknown interface is 
> implemented. How should I make this error, emit some #error directive
> in the system.h file from the interface? I don't know that much about CDL.
> 

I think implementing an unknown interface is treated as a NO-OP.

The best way would be like this:
  cdl_interface XYZ {
  }
  requires { !XYZ }

This way, if it is ever implemented, the "requires" statement can't be
satisfied and there will be an error.

-- 
Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com>
MLB Associates


-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss