This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: [eCos] Why eCos licence and not LGPL?
- From: Andrew Lunn <andrew at lunn dot ch>
- To: Vincent Catros <Vincent dot Catros at elios-informatique dot fr>
- Cc: ecos-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 15:54:53 +0100
- Subject: Re: [ECOS] [eCos] Why eCos licence and not LGPL?
- References: <004901c40b62$a691cc90$7407a8c0@figuier>
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 03:26:20PM +0100, Vincent Catros wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It seems to me that eCos licence and LGPL are equivalent.
>
> Is it true?
>
> If yes, why this licence (eCos) has been created insteed of using LGPL?
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss/2002-05/msg00206.html
Andrew
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss