[ECOS] RE : [ECOS] Licence consideratios.

["Vincent Catros" <Vincent dot Catros at elios-informatique dot fr>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Lunn [mailto:andrew@lunn.ch]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 3:57 PM
> To: Vincent Catros
> Cc: ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [ECOS] Licence consideratios.
> 
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 03:23:57PM +0100, Vincent Catros wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm about to deliver an FTP server.
> > This server has been originaly developped for RTEMs and therefore
was
> > released under RTEMs licence.
> 
> http://www.rtems.com/license/
> 
> There appears to be 4 RTEMS license. Which exactly is this FTP server
> license under?

In fact, licence terms were not included into the files I downloaded.
I have contacted the original contributor that said to me the package
was released under "RTEMs licence".
Regarding the name of four licences, I assumed it was "Primary licence".

Then I have included RTEMs "Primary licence" terms into files and
submited those files to the original contributor for agreement.
He gave me this agreement.

But I can't switch to eCos licence as, I think, all contributors should
give their agreement.

Is this a problem to include files into eCos distribution?

Vincent


-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss