This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: RE : Licence consideratios.
- From: Jonathan Larmour <jifl at eCosCentric dot com>
- To: Vincent Catros <Vincent dot Catros at elios-informatique dot fr>
- Cc: 'Andrew Lunn' <andrew at lunn dot ch>, ecos-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 17:55:09 +0000
- Subject: Re: [ECOS] RE : [ECOS] Licence consideratios.
- References: <000301c40b6b$b0d064b0$7407a8c0@figuier>
Vincent Catros wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Lunn [mailto:andrew@lunn.ch]
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 3:57 PM
To: Vincent Catros
Cc: ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [ECOS] Licence consideratios.
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 03:23:57PM +0100, Vincent Catros wrote:
Hello,
I'm about to deliver an FTP server.
This server has been originaly developped for RTEMs and therefore
was released under RTEMs licence.
In fact, licence terms were not included into the files I downloaded.
I have contacted the original contributor that said to me the package
was released under "RTEMs licence".
Regarding the name of four licences, I assumed it was "Primary licence".
i.e. http://www.rtems.com/license/LICENSE
Then I have included RTEMs "Primary licence" terms into files and
submited those files to the original contributor for agreement.
He gave me this agreement.
But I can't switch to eCos licence as, I think, all contributors should
give their agreement.
Is this a problem to include files into eCos distribution?
After some consideration, we are unable to include it. IANAL of course, but
it appears to not fit with the existing eCos license. The RTEMS license
says: : "[...] linking other files with RTEMS objects to produce an
executable application, does not by itself cause the resulting executable
application to be covered by the GNU General Public License."
However, these files will be linked with non-RTEMS objects. Therefore the
full GPL would apply, therefore it is not acceptable in the main source
base, sorry. We _can_ put it up in our contributions section though, just
not include it in the main source base.
Jifl
--
eCosCentric http://www.eCosCentric.com/ The eCos and RedBoot experts
>>>>> Visit us in booth 2527 at the Embedded Systems Conference 2004 <<<<<
March 30 - April 1, San Francisco http://www.esconline.com/electronicaUSA/
--["No sense being pessimistic, it wouldn't work anyway"]-- Opinions==mine
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss