This is the mail archive of the
ecos-maintainers@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: New Assignment: AFTEK
- From: Alex Schuilenburg <alexs at ecoscentric dot com>
- To: Jonathan Larmour <jifl at eCosCentric dot com>
- Cc: ecos-maintainers at ecos dot sourceware dot org
- Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2004 10:00:05 +0100
- Subject: Re: New Assignment: AFTEK
- Organization: eCosCentric Limited
FYI, nothing further received on this assignment, which remains invalid.
-- Alex
Jonathan Larmour wrote:
Andrew Lunn wrote:
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 09:10:27AM +0100, Alex Schuilenburg wrote:
Attached.
And before anyone asks, this is all that was sent in two
seperate 1 page faxes. The fax was stored electronically so
the address resolution is a result of the sender's fax
scanner. No list of files was provided.
Mostly useless...
We need to track down what this is for. I've no idea. It does
not fit
to any contribution i know of which is in the pipeline.
Ah, no I know this one (and you can see - barely - my name at the
top of the first page). It's this contrib:
http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000068
which doesn't contain Aftek either.
Googling for "aftek infosys eCos" only produces two old hits. If you
can make out the senders FAX numbers could you send a FAX back asking
them to telephone/email you so we can get this straightened out.
I'll follow up by e-mail directly.
Ack! I assume you are going to ask for a second fax with the contents.
For the doc to be legal, the address should be clearly visible, which it
is not in this case. For now though, a fax should do until we receive
the original via post when this is should not be an issue since I assume
it is legible there :-)
-- Alex