This is the mail archive of the ecos-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the eCos project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Avoid gcc 3.2 bug with signals

From: Jonathan Larmour <jifl at eCosCentric dot com>
To: Robin Farine <robin dot farine at acn-group dot ch>
Cc: eCos patches ml <ecos-patches at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 14:17:07 +0000
Subject: Re: Avoid gcc 3.2 bug with signals
References: <200302130002.h1D02ks24857@garibaldi.jifvik.org.> <1045123640.32477.5.camel@halftrack>

Robin Farine wrote:

On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 01:02, Jonathan Larmour wrote:

+
+	* include/signal.inl (raise): Use if/else rather than switch to
+	avoid GCC 3.2 bug.
+


Quite a change just to avoid a compiler bug no? I'd rather avoid the
compiler but I guess you don't have the choice.

It seems that the GCC guys are quite insistent. From a strict interpretation they're right (although that doesn't mean they should reject it IMHO).

+    if ( __sigfun == SIG_DFL {

                              ^^^
Something's missing here :)

oops! Fixed.

jifl
--
eCosCentric    http://www.eCosCentric.com/    The eCos and RedBoot experts
--[ "You can complain because roses have thorns, or you ]--
--[  can rejoice because thorns have roses." -Lincoln   ]-- Opinions==mine

References:
- Avoid gcc 3.2 bug with signals
  - From: Jonathan Larmour
- Re: Avoid gcc 3.2 bug with signals
  - From: Robin Farine

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]