This is the mail archive of the ecos-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the eCos project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
> > > There is an issue in that I have changed a header file. I did a > look to see > > if anything called cyg_libc_time_itoa() and AFAICT nothing did. > > Actually look at > ecos/packages/language/c/libc/time/current/include/time.inl to see where > it's used, although it should be benign, albeit possibly with a warning. Whoops, sorry about that - forgot to grep .inl files (red face). > Not surprisingly I'm a little reluctant to apply a patch in generic code > just because of a toolchain bug. Is it likely this toolchain bug would be > fixed soon? Has someone checked if it's fixed in more recent GCC? or32 is not yet in the main gcc trunk - I am using an 'experimental' version published on the OpenCores site. No-one from OpenCores has responded yet. If I knew more about GCC porting, I'd tackle it myself but it looks a bit daunting. > If it really won't be for a while, then I'll apply the patch since it is > pretty benign. Once you send a new patch including time.inl and a > ChangeLog entry anyway ;-). Patchfile attached. Robert Cragie, Design Engineer _______________________________________________________________ Jennic Ltd, Furnival Street, Sheffield, S1 4QT, UK http://www.jennic.com Tel: +44 (0) 114 281 2655 _______________________________________________________________
Attachment:
language_c_libc_time.patch
Description: Binary data
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |