This is the mail archive of the
ecos-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: [ECOS] libc-time-clock test doesn't seem to be written correctly??
- From: Jonathan Larmour <jifl at eCosCentric dot com>
- To: Brij Bihari Pandey <fuzzhead012 at yahoo dot com>
- Cc: ecos-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com, ecos-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 05:52:41 +0100
- Subject: Re: [ECOS] libc-time-clock test doesn't seem to be written correctly??
- References: <20030621155139.62560.qmail@web21003.mail.yahoo.com>
Brij Bihari Pandey wrote:
Hi Jonathan,
test FAIL messages. Possibly I would have - how could there be problem with
the
test, wouldn't anyone on list have mentioned it earlier, if it was so?
Not necessarily I suppose. But there would probably have been something in
the wide variety of hardware that used to exist in the Red Hat test farm.
You mean eCos people at RedHat were aware of this problem?
I was one of the eCos people at Red Hat. And I didn't know about the
problem. Now there's just one (and he sometimes denies being an eCos team
person either because he wasn't when the team was canned, but I don't agree).
I am attaching the "cvs diff -u5 -p" output for the clock.c file along with
this mail for your reviewing.
That's fine. I've checked it in (with some trivial changes in comments).
Thanks for that!
Jifl
--
eCosCentric http://www.eCosCentric.com/ The eCos and RedBoot experts
--[ "You can complain because roses have thorns, or you ]--
--[ can rejoice because thorns have roses." -Lincoln ]-- Opinions==mine