This is the mail archive of the
ecos-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: at91 cdl refactoring , settable baudrate from redboot
- From: Jani Monoses <jani at iv dot ro>
- To: Thomas Koeller <thomas dot koeller at baslerweb dot com>
- Cc: ecos-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 15:06:45 +0300
- Subject: Re: at91 cdl refactoring , settable baudrate from redboot
- References: <20040212162319.575dd4a4.jani@iv.ro><40369581.1070209@eCosCentric.com><200403081317.24085.thomas.koeller@baslerweb.com><200408301401.55874.thomas.koeller@baslerweb.com>
Hello Thomas
> On Monday 08 March 2004 13:17, Thomas Koeller wrote:
> >
> > FWIW, I agree with you that most of the cdl options in question should be
> > in the platfrom HAl for maximum flexibility. The platform HAL packages I
> > am maintaining are not exactly like one of the evaluation boards. Some of
> > them have additional I/O channels besides the two serial ports, and they
> > do in fact use a special startup mode, which is a variant of the ROMRAM
> > mode that leaves .rodata in rom.
Ok I lied, I have some comments :)
What about the options below which are pretty common among all platforms.
Do these need to be in all cdl files? I understand from what you say that
your platforms have extra comm channels and startup types, but do rom monitor
and build options need special treatment too? Or is it just my patch undone?
Anyway I think it's easier to just apply this and be done with it, even if
it's a lot of copy paste :)
> + cdl_option CYGSEM_HAL_ROM_MONITOR {
> + cdl_option CYGSEM_HAL_USE_ROM_MONITOR {
> + cdl_component CYGPKG_REDBOOT_HAL_OPTIONS {
> + cdl_option CYGBLD_BUILD_REDBOOT_BIN {
> + cdl_component CYGBLD_GLOBAL_OPTIONS {