This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [RFA]: opcodes alpha disassembler

To: Michael Snyder <msnyder at cygnus dot com>
Subject: Re: [RFA]: opcodes alpha disassembler
From: Jason R Thorpe <thorpej at zembu dot com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 14:28:18 -0700
Cc: "Chris G. Demetriou" <cgd at sibyte dot com>,binutils at sourceware dot cygnus dot com, gdb-patches at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
Organization: Zembu Labs, Inc.
References: <200007210143.SAA21952@cleaver.cygnus.com> <mailpost.964143925.26191@baton.sibyte.com> <5t1z0njs5u.fsf@highland.sibyte.com> <3978AB62.72DA@cygnus.com> <5twvifi740.fsf@highland.sibyte.com> <3978AE70.69D5@cygnus.com>
Reply-To: thorpej at zembu dot com

On Fri, Jul 21, 2000 at 01:11:28PM -0700, Michael Snyder wrote:

 > Well then ultimately, somebody needs to "multi-arch" these
 > codes somehow.  But in the mean time, how much worse would 
 > a vms or NT person be?  What output would they get presently?
 > "<undefined>"?

Well, let's consider the VMS `mfpr_whami' PALcode op.  A VMS
person using an OSF/1 disassebler would see that as `rti',
not `<undefined>'.

-- 
        -- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej@zembu.com>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFA]: opcodes alpha disassembler
  - From: Michael Snyder

References:
- [RFA]: opcodes alpha disassembler
  - From: Michael Snyder
- Re: [RFA]: opcodes alpha disassembler
  - From: Chris G. Demetriou
- Re: [RFA]: opcodes alpha disassembler
  - From: Michael Snyder
- Re: [RFA]: opcodes alpha disassembler
  - From: Chris G. Demetriou
- Re: [RFA]: opcodes alpha disassembler
  - From: Michael Snyder

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]