Re: [PATCH] GDB command-line switches and annotations docs

[Eli Zaretskii <eliz at delorie dot com>]

> I admit I haven't documented the event loop machinery at all (that
> should actually go in the internal manual). I thoroughly commented the
> code though, if that's any excuse :-).
> 
> I wasn't going to document the existance of target 'async' either,
> because that's also supposed to go away, and be absorbed into a new
> and improved target 'remote'. There are still a bunch of loose ends to
> finish before that's going to happen. So I am not sure what the best
> course of action is.

If it would help, I could add a note telling that the event loop is
still not fully asynchronous, with a FIXME comment that the note
should be removed when the target side is done.  Okay?