This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [patch] fix for infinite recursion in lookup_symbol
- To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at is dot elta dot co dot il>
- Subject: Re: [patch] fix for infinite recursion in lookup_symbol
- From: Christopher Faylor <cgf at redhat dot com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 12:27:23 -0500
- Cc: Fernando Nasser <fnasser at cygnus dot com>, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- References: <3A671351.3C33ADFF@cygnus.com> <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010118181831.8466B-100000@is>
On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 06:21:18PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
>On Thu, 18 Jan 2001, Fernando Nasser wrote:
>
>> if any opposition causes the rejection of a patch, any individual
>> can make his/her preferences prevail by systematically "opposing" to patches
>> that go against his believes.
>
>I assume that individuals with such attitude are absent from this fine
>forum. I have yet to see any sign of such an approach from anyone here.
>
>Therefore, I don't think we need to consider such a possibility as a
>real one.
I agree. I was really thinking of this as a special case situation where
we could get patches into gdb when the patch maintainer is inexplicably
absent.
If *anyone* disagrees with the patch then it shouldn't go in.
cgf