This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH] New C++ abstraction patch
Andrew Cagney wrote:
>
> Daniel Berlin wrote:
>
> > I did this at first, but it seemed those only happened for certain
> > headers (something to do with $(SRCDIR)), so I undid it before
> > submitting the patch.
> > I'll redo it.
>
> Yep. What is happening is that no one can be bothered converting the
> entire file to that convention - automake will make the problem go away
> right :-). Instead things just get incrementally tweaked when a new
> file is added, broken include dependency gets noticed (or someone gets
> board).
Actually, I thought that the practice was only done selectively.
I don't see its usefulness, except for headers that might have
different names for different configurations.