Re: [RFA] gdb.base/callfuncs.exp: make all test names unique

[Fernando Nasser <fnasser at redhat dot com>]

Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote:
> 
> chastain> ! gdb_test "next" "t_double_values\\(double_val1, double_val2\\);.*" "next 1"
> chastain> ! gdb_test "next" "t_structs_c\\(struct_val1\\);.*" "next 2"
> 
> snyder> I wonder if it would not be preferable to use "next over t_double_values"
> snyder> and "next over t_structs_c".
> 
> nasser> Michael (Chastain), please check it in your patch with these changes.
> nasser> Thank you very much to help eliminating these ambiguities.
> 
> Oops, actually that should be "next to t_double_values" rather than
> "next over t_double_values" and so on.  It still looks better than
> "next" or "next 1".
> 
> Works for me, I will use "next to t_double_values" and check it in.
> 

Thanks again.

Cheers,
Fernando

-- 
Fernando Nasser
Red Hat Canada Ltd.                     E-Mail:  fnasser@redhat.com
2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
Toronto, Ontario   M4P 2C9