Re: RFA: Properly detect that GDB was compiled without MI support

[Jim Blandy <jimb at zwingli dot cygnus dot com>]

Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@cygnus.com> writes:
> Jim, I must be seeing double, but I think this output is already
> handled in the -re directly below the one you changed.
> (Ok I am jet-lagged, so excuse me if I am wrong).
> 
> 	-re ".*unrecognized option.*for a complete list of options." {
> 	    untested "Skip mi tests (not compiled with mi support)."
> 	    remote_close host;
> 	    return -1;
> 	}
> 	-re ".*Interpreter `mi' unrecognized." {
> 	    untested "Skip mi tests (not compiled with mi support)."
> 	    remote_close host;
> 	    return -1;
> 	}

No, you're absolutely right.  I generated that patch against an
internal branch cut on January 23; Mark Kettenis fixed the bug in the
public sources on January 21, and I guess it hadn't gotten merged yet.
Shame on me for not testing against the public sources.

I withdraw the patch.