This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: PATCH: partial merge of dwarf2.h
- To: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni at cygnus dot com>
- Subject: Re: PATCH: partial merge of dwarf2.h
- From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at is dot elta dot co dot il>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 12:04:34 +0300 (IDT)
- cc: Per Bothner <per at bothner dot com>, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Elena Zannoni wrote:
> Per Bothner writes:
> > Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@cygnus.com> writes:
> >
> > > Shouldn't the copyright years include 2001 as well?
> >
> > Well, the gcc/dwarf2.h doesn't, and this is basically a merge
> > from that. (There are some formatting differences, and there
> > are also some extensions in the binutils version. I'm leaving those
> > as is for now.)
>
> Ok, you haven't changed anything. But still, the file itself has been
> touched. Hmm, I don't know what the rules are in this case.
The rules are that the Copyright notice should mention years when
someone worked on a released version of a file. So if the changes
were done by GCC maintainers only in 2000, I think it is okay not to
include 2001.