Re: PATCH: partial merge of dwarf2.h

[Elena Zannoni <ezannoni at cygnus dot com>]

Eli Zaretskii writes:
 > 
 > On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Elena Zannoni wrote:
 > 
 > > Per Bothner writes:
 > >  > Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@cygnus.com> writes:
 > >  > 
 > >  > > Shouldn't the copyright years include 2001 as well?
 > >  > 
 > >  > Well, the gcc/dwarf2.h doesn't, and this is basically a merge
 > >  > from that.  (There are some formatting differences, and there
 > >  > are also some extensions in the binutils version.  I'm leaving those
 > >  > as is for now.)
 > > 
 > > Ok, you haven't changed anything. But still, the file itself has been
 > > touched. Hmm, I don't know what the rules are in this case.
 > 
 > The rules are that the Copyright notice should mention years when
 > someone worked on a released version of a file.  So if the changes
 > were done by GCC maintainers only in 2000, I think it is okay not to
 > include 2001.
 > 

Thanks for clarifying this, Eli.
I withdraw my objection.

Elena