This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [RFA] enum enable



Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il> writes:
> [Dig, dig] and it looks like this is expected: my references indicate
> that enumeration constants and function names belong to the same
> namespace in C programs.

Right.  The changes I asked about were all renamings of *structure*
members, not enum members.  Structure members are supposed to be in
per-type namespaces; I was astonished to hear some version of GCC was
having problems with that.  But it wasn't.

I can go re-patch, recompile, and send you the error messages, but in
order to correct your patch, you'll need to update your source tree
anyway, right?


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]