This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [rfa] gdbserver 2/n - signals

To: ac131313 at cygnus dot com
Subject: Re: [rfa] gdbserver 2/n - signals
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz at is dot elta dot co dot il>
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2001 11:02:01 +0300
CC: dmj+ at andrew dot cmu dot edu, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
References: <20010719120143.A19963@nevyn.them.org> <3B574A5D.6030403@cygnus.com> <20010719141742.A25968@nevyn.them.org> <3B5755C9.8070003@cygnus.com> <20010719145237.A28070@nevyn.them.org> <9003-Fri20Jul2001103107+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <20010720083249.A21309@nevyn.them.org> <9743-Fri20Jul2001213136+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <3B58C35E.7020106@cygnus.com>
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at is dot elta dot co dot il>

> Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 19:48:46 -0400
> From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
> 
> Something needs to be documented - a recent question on the bug-gdb list 
> about those exact values confirms this.

I was unable to find the message with such a question.  Could you
point me to it?  Thanks.

References:
- [rfa] gdbserver 2/n - signals
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: [rfa] gdbserver 2/n - signals
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: [rfa] gdbserver 2/n - signals
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: [rfa] gdbserver 2/n - signals
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: [rfa] gdbserver 2/n - signals
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: [rfa] gdbserver 2/n - signals
  - From: Eli Zaretskii
- Re: [rfa] gdbserver 2/n - signals
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: [rfa] gdbserver 2/n - signals
  - From: Eli Zaretskii
- Re: [rfa] gdbserver 2/n - signals
  - From: Andrew Cagney

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]