This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA] Testsuite addition for x86 linux GDB and SIGALRM fix
- To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at is dot elta dot co dot il>, Fernando Nasser <fnasser at redhat dot com>, Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at cygnus dot com>, Michael Snyder <msnyder at cygnus dot com>, Daniel Jacobowitz <dmj+ at andrew dot cmu dot edu>, gdb-patches at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
- Subject: Re: [RFA] Testsuite addition for x86 linux GDB and SIGALRM fix
- From: Fernando Nasser <fnasser at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 13:36:18 -0400
- Organization: Red Hat , Inc. - Toronto
- References: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010726185349.2777B-100000@is> <3B6050EE.6E3D62DB@cygnus.com>
Just to clarify one thing: I did not post any RFC/RFA for a change in the GDB CLI command set.
A month or so ago I made a comment, when we were discussing some testsuite changes, about a _what if_ scenario where we would have a "finishi" command. For the sake of intellectual exercise of a few interested parties, a few details of this _what if_ scenario were discussed. As it was just an exercise, the thing died up quickly.
Suddenly, someone found the old thread and made a comment (perhaps without re-reading the complete old thread?) and I don't know how the whole thing started to be refereed to as "proposed changes"!
Although I still believe that we should have two commands and that they should try and behave at the abstraction level they are defined to, I am not proposing any changes. So, unless someone is really considering the possibility of adding a command or two, in which case I would gladly continue the discussion until we reach some conclusion, I suggest that we may just resume our regular activities.
Regards to all,
Fernando
--
Fernando Nasser
Red Hat - Toronto E-Mail: fnasser@redhat.com
2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
Toronto, Ontario M4P 2C9