Re: What is on the 5.1 branch; Was: [rfc] Re: read_register_bytes() bug; was my Regcache revamp

["Eli Zaretskii" <eliz at is dot elta dot co dot il>]

> Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 01:42:51 -0400
> From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
> 
> As far as I know most of the patches going past at the moment are not 
> going onto the branch(1).  Hmm, quick check, I've attached a copy of the 
> 5.1 ChangeLog.

Thanks.

Why aren't the entries there in chronological order?

> > Perhaps in the future each patch could tell explicitly whether it is
> > meant ffor the branch or not, to prevent confusion.
> 
> I've been using the prefix [.../5.1] for anything 5.1 related.

Perhaps everyone could follow that convention.