This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: What is on the 5.1 branch; Was: [rfc] Re: read_register_bytes() bug; was my Regcache revamp

> Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 11:16:04 -0400
> From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
> > 
> > Why is it such a problem to label the entries with the date when the
> > change is committed?  I don't see any disadvantages to this, only
> > advantages
> 
> The disadvantage I'm aware of occures when you're trying to determine if 
> a specific change has been committed (I tend to be doing this a lot). 
> The date (especially the pre ISO date which included the time) makes a 
> really good identifying stamp.

Alternatively, you could search for some string in the ChangeLog entry
posted here (the same place where I guess you find the date to look
for).
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]