This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFA] SSE registers for cygxin target.

From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at cygnus dot com>
To: Christopher Faylor <cgf at redhat dot com>
Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 23:46:58 -0500
Subject: Re: [RFA] SSE registers for cygxin target.
References: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1011126143653.12758G-100000@is> <3C02A966.30003@cygnus.com> <20011126222315.GA10876@redhat.com>

> On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 03:43:18PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> 
>>>On Mon, 26 Nov 2001, Pierre Muller wrote:
>>>
>>>
> 
>>>>-#undef HAVE_SSE_REGS	/* FIXME! win32-nat.c needs to support XMMi 
>>>>registers */
>>>>+/* Use SSE registers if winnt.h contains information about them.  */
>>>>+#ifdef HAVE_CONTEXT_EXTENDED_REGISTERS
>>>>+#define HAVE_SSE_REGS
>>>>+#else

> So, should I hold off accepting this patch, then?  It seems pretty
> straight-forward except for this issue.

The patch follows established conventions so no point in holding back on it.

enjoy,
Andrew

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFA] SSE registers for cygxin target.
  - From: Christopher Faylor

References:
- Re: [RFA] SSE registers for cygxin target.
  - From: Eli Zaretskii
- Re: [RFA] SSE registers for cygxin target.
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: [RFA] SSE registers for cygxin target.
  - From: Christopher Faylor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]