This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFA] Don't use thread_db on corefiles


On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 11:36:06AM -0800, Michael Snyder wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > 
> > On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 03:39:20PM -0800, Michael Snyder wrote:
> > > Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > > > I'll do that.  A binary is at:
> > > >   http://www.them.org/~drow/mtc.tgz
> > > > (The core file is a 23MB sparse file because of the unmapped user
> > > > stacks.  Careful where you unpack it.)
> > >
> > > Oops -- Daniel, I think you sent the wrong corefile.  The one in
> > > the tarball is only 1.4 megabytes, and was generated by "gdb ./lotsa_um
> > > core".
> > > Probably you ran gdb in the directory and it dropped core, overwriting
> > > the corefile that you meant to send.  ;-(
> > 
> > <falls over laughing>
> > 
> > Yes, so I did.  Oops.  I'm absolutely bewildered as to how that
> > happened - since the core file in that directory on my desktop is the
> > right one, and older than the tarfile I made!
> > 
> > Please look at http://www.them.org/~drow/mtc2.tgz, which is the proper
> > core.
> 
> That file seems to be "not found".

*sigh* mtc2.tar.gz, or that link will work now.  Either way.  Sorry.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz                           Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]